Opinion
6:23-CV-00336
08-23-2023
CAROL B. WHITEHURST MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JUDGMENT
DEE D. DRELL, SENIOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, noting the absence of any objection, and having determined that the findings and recommendations are correct under the applicable law;
IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision should be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). More particularly, the Commissioner is instructed to again re-evaluate the claimant's residual functional capacity, specifically imposing physical restrictions commiserate with Claimant's spinal condition, and to determine whether, based upon a properly evaluated RFC, he is disabled. The claimant should be afforded the opportunity to submit updated medical evidence and to testify at another hearing.
A fourth sentence remand constitutes a final judgment that triggers the filing period for an EAJA fee application. Shalala v. Schaeffer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Freeman v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 552, 553 (5th Cir. 1993).
THUS DONE AND SIGNED