From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 22, 2010
No. CIV S-06-1857 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1857 GEB EFB P.

July 22, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 26, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 26, 2010, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's due process claim against defendant Cervantes is dismissed with prejudice; and

3. With the exception of plaintiff's cognizable retaliation claim against Cervantes, all claims are dismissed without prejudice to plaintiff bringing them in separate civil rights actions.


Summaries of

Woods v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 22, 2010
No. CIV S-06-1857 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Woods v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:EARNEST C. WOODS, Plaintiff, v. TOM L. CAREY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 22, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1857 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2010)