From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 20, 2011
No. CIV S-06-1857 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1857 GEB EFB P.

April 20, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no exceptional circumstances in this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's April 15, 2011 motion for appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Woods v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 20, 2011
No. CIV S-06-1857 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Woods v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:EARNEST C. WOODS, Plaintiff, v. TOM L. CAREY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 20, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1857 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011)