From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Ayers

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 27, 2007
No. CIV S01-1724 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S01-1724 LKK KJM P.

March 27, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 21, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 21, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.


Summaries of

Woods v. Ayers

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 27, 2007
No. CIV S01-1724 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Woods v. Ayers

Case Details

Full title:BARRY DEWAYNE WOODS, Petitioner, v. ROBERT L. AYERS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 27, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S01-1724 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2007)