From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodrum v. Pierce

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso
Nov 4, 1926
288 S.W. 541 (Tex. Civ. App. 1926)

Opinion

No. 1896.

November 4, 1926.

Appeal from District Court, Stephens County; C. O. Hamlin, Judge.

Suit between W. F. Woodrum and J. S. Pierce. From a judgment for the latter, the former appeals. Appeal dismissed.

V. L. Shurtleff, of Breckenridge, and J. L. Lackey, of Wichita Falls, for appellant.

Hickman Bateman and Benson Dean, all of Breckenridge, for appellee.


This appeal is prosecuted from a final judgment rendered in the district court of Stephens county, on June 26, 1925, in which a jury trial was had and judgment entered thereon in favor of appellee, and against appellant for the sum of $6,424.67, principal and interest due upon a promissory note declared upon. From an order of the trial court overruling appellant's motion for a new trial, appellant gave notice of appeal. The appeal was perfected to the Court of Civil Appeals at Eastland, Tex., and from that court duly transferred to this court, and in this court submitted on October 5, 1926.

No briefs by either party have been filed in this case in this court. The rules for these courts will therefore be enforced, and, on motion of appellee, the appeal taken in this case ordered dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Woodrum v. Pierce

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso
Nov 4, 1926
288 S.W. 541 (Tex. Civ. App. 1926)
Case details for

Woodrum v. Pierce

Case Details

Full title:WOODRUM v. PIERCE

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso

Date published: Nov 4, 1926

Citations

288 S.W. 541 (Tex. Civ. App. 1926)

Citing Cases

McGhee v. Southwest Industries Co.

Under such state of the record it becomes our duty to sustain the motion to dismiss the appeal, and it is…