From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. Bolin

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 12, 1942
10 So. 2d 296 (Ala. 1942)

Opinion

6 Div. 945.

October 8, 1942. Rehearing Denied November 12, 1942.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Walker County; R. L. Blanton, Judge.

Action on a policy or certificate of life insurance by Lulu Bolin and others against the Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Arthur Fite, of Jasper, for appellant.

The provision in the constitution and laws of appellant that the policy sued on should not become effective until the acceptance slip attached to it was signed by the insured was binding. Since the evidence showed that insured never signed it, the policy never became effective, and appellant was entitled to the affirmative charge for that reason. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Burrell, 204 Ala. 210, 85 So. 762; Ferlesie v. Cook, 201 Ala. 571, 78 So. 915; Paterson Edey Lbr. Co. v. Carolina Portland Cement Co., 215 Ala. 621, 112 So. 245; Graham v. Caperton, 176 Ala. 116, 57 So. 741; Royal Exch. Assur. v. Almon, 202 Ala. 374, 80 So. 456; National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Bridgeforth, 220 Ala. 314, 124 So. 886; Loveman, Joseph Loeb v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 233 Ala. 518, 173 So. 7; McCutchen v. All States Life Ins. Co., 229 Ala. 616, 158 So. 729; Lewis v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, 220 Ala. 270, 124 So. 889; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Reed, 208 Ala. 457, 94 So. 910. Constitution and laws of appellant were a part of the contract between the parties. Code 1923, § 8452; Woodmen of the World v. McHenry, 197 Ala. 541, 73 So. 97; National Order of Mosaic Templars of America v. Lile, 200 Ala. 508, 76 So. 450; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Browning, 231 Ala. 162, 163 So. 786. Application of insured was part of policy contract, and his false statement was a warranty. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Moore, 232 Ala. 463, 168 So. 577; Sovereign Camp v. Thompson, 234 Ala. 216, 174 So. 761; Sovereign Camp v. Sirten, 234 Ala. 421, 175 So. 539; Brotherhood of Railway Steamship Clerks, etc. v. Riggins, 214 Ala. 79, 107 So. 44. Requirement that insured sign acceptance slip before policy became effective could not be waived by party delivering the certificate. Padgett v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 218 Ala. 255, 118 So. 456; Huggins v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 221 Ala. 126, 127 So. 821; Woodmen of the World v. McHenry, supra; Mosaic Templars v. Hearon, 153 Ark. 568, 241 S.W. 35, 27 A.L.R. 1147; Dickey v. Continental Casualty Co., 40 Tex.Civ.App. 199, 89 S.W. 436; Newcomb v. Provident Fund Soc., 5 Colo. App. 140, 38 P. 61; Yarbrough v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 210 Ala. 188, 97 So. 654.

Pennington Tweedy, of Jasper, for appellees.

A written contract to be legal and binding does not have to be signed. If all the terms are agreed upon between the parties, it is a legal and binding contract without either or both signing it. Southern R. Co. v. Huntsville Lbr. Co., 191 Ala. 333, 67 So. 695; Cassel's Mills v. Strater Bros. Grain Co., 166 Ala. 274, 51 So. 973; Paterson Edey Lbr. Co. v. Carolina Portland Cement Co., 215 Ala. 621, 112 So. 245; 6 R.C.L. 641; 58 C.J. 728; Whatley v. Reese, 128 Ala. 500, 29 So. 606. Insured's wife, an agent, could and did sign the certificate slip connected with the insurance policy, and insured accepted the policy, including all of the terms of the certificate slip, and he is bound by all of the terms of the policy. Wild v. Crum, 207 Ala. 132, 92 So. 252; Langham v. Jackson, 211 Ala. 416, 100 So. 757. The burden was upon defendant to show that at the time the application was made, or at the time the policy was delivered, the insured was suffering with a disease which increased the risk of loss, or that the statements made by him were made with actual intent to deceive. Ala. Code 1928, § 8507; Padgett v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 218 Ala. 255, 118 So. 456; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Rowe, 225 Ala. 336, 143 So. 171; Reliance Life Ins. Co. v. Sneed, 217 Ala. 669., 117 So. 307; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Jackson, 233 Ala. 120, 170 So. 192; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Gibbs, 217 Ala. 108, 114 So. 915; Beason v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 208 Ala. 276, 94 So. 123; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Deese, 236 Ala. 85, 181 So. 274; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Moore, 232 Ala. 463, 168 So. 577.


Appellant is a fraternal benefit society, incorporated under the laws of the state of Nebraska.

The appeal is from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Walker County in a suit by appellees against appellant on a benefit certificate issued by appellant on the life of Davie Bolin under date of May 29, 1940. The insured died of myocarditis and bronchial asthma on December 21, 1940.

The complaint consists of one count in Code form. Further pleading is in short by consent, with leave, etc.

The benefit certificate was delivered by Z. E. Watson, financial secretary of Hamilton, Alabama, Camp No. 115, to Mrs. Bolin, wife of the insured, on May 29, 1940, at Hamilton while the insured was in Birmingham being treated by physicians for prostatitis. Mrs. Bolin delivered the benefit certificate to the insured upon his return from Birmingham. All premiums due were paid by the insured and accepted by the insurer. At the time the benefit certificate was delivered to Mrs. Bolin she signed the insured's name to an acceptance slip which is in the following words and figures:

"D. Bolin (Orig)

5-13-40.

"Applicant's Acceptance of Life Paid-Up at Age 85 Certificate.

"(This slip must be signed in the presence of the Financial Secretary and by him detached and forwarded to the Secretary of the Society)

Age 58 Amount of certificate $5000.00 Jun 7 Paid

Amount Due I have read the above Month Amount certificate No. 1712359 May 15.35 of the Woodmen of the World Installment for Life Insurance Society fractional part of and the conditions named month Installment for therein and hereby agree June 25.60 full month. to and accept the same as a member of camp No. 115, State of Ala. this 29 Total amount to be day of May, 1940, and collected upon delivery warrant that I am in good ery of certificate and health at this time, and remitted with this have not been sick or acceptance slip to the injured since the date of secretary of the my application, and that all society first mail requirements of the 40.95 constitution, laws and D. Bolin, Hamilton, by-laws of this society, a Ala. copy of which I have received, have been complied with.

"D. Bolin,

"Witness: Z. E. Watson, Financial Secretary "Field Man C. Palmer Cashier Dept. M. June 7, 1940."

The here pertinent provisions of the constitution, laws and by-laws of appellant society, and which are a part of the benefit certificate contract, are:

"Section 56. The liability of the society for payment of benefits shall not begin until * * * the applicant shall have * * * signed his certificate and acceptance slip attached thereto. * * * The foregoing are hereby made a part of the consideration for, and are conditions precedent to, the liability for the payment of benefits.

"Section 57. (1st) The certificate is issued in consideration of the representations, warranties and agreements made by the person named therein in his application to become a member, in the form and as passed upon and accepted by the medical director.

"Section 58. The applicant shall also sign the beneficiary certificate and the acceptance slip attached thereto; said acceptance slip shall be detached by the financial secretary of the camp and forwarded to the secretary of the society.

"Section 59. Failure to comply with any of the several conditions precedent named in these laws shall be an absolute bar to any claim on the beneficiary fund of this society, under or by virtue of any beneficiary certificate that may have been issued, or that may hereafter be issued to an applicant or by reason of any steps taken by an applicant to entitle him to the same, or by a subordinate camp or member thereof; and no state manager, field representative, fieldman, officer, member or employee of the society, or of the Sovereign Camp, head camp or subordinate camp, has any authority to change, alter, modify or waive the foregoing requirements or the consequences thereof in any manner. * * *

"Section 82. (a) No officer, employee or agent of the society or the Sovereign Camp, head camp or of any camp, has the power, right or authority to waive any of the conditions upon which beneficiary certificates are issued, or to change, vary or waive any of the provisions of this constitution or these laws, nor shall any custom or course of dealing on the part of any financial secretary or of any camp or any number of camps — with or without the knowledge of any officer of the society — have the effect of so changing, modifying, waiving or foregoing such laws or requirements. Each and every beneficiary certificate is issued only upon the conditions stated in and subject to the constitution, and laws, then in force or thereafter enacted, nor shall the knowledge or act of any officer or employee of this society constitute a waiver of the provisions of these laws by the society or an estoppel of this society.

"(b) The articles of incorporation, the constitution, laws and by-laws of the society, the application and medical examination, or declaration of insurability, if accepted in lieu of medical examination, signed by the applicant, and all amendments to each thereof, the benefit certificate, and any riders attached thereto or endorsements made thereon by the president or secretary of the society shall constitute the contract between the society and the member."

Appellant insists that the above quoted provisions of section 56 of appellant's constitution, laws and by-laws are binding on the insured, and that the benefit certificate never became effective because the insured's name was signed to the acceptance slip by insured's wife in his absence.

The undisputed evidence discloses that all premiums due on the benefit certificate were paid by the insured; that the certificate itself contained the following statement: "I have read the above certificate and accept the same and warrant that I am now in good health and have not been sick or injured since the date of my application for this certificate." The benefit certificate bears the signature of Davie Bolin, the insured, and there is no evidence that he did not actually sign it.

One may be bound by an agreement to which his signature is affixed by adoption or ratification as well as though it had been written by his own hand. Wild v. Crum, 207 Ala. 132, 92 So. 252; Langham et al. v. Jackson et al., 211 Ala. 416, 100 So. 757; 13 Corpus Juris, § 130, p. 307; 17 Corpus Juris Secundum, Contracts, § 62(c), p. 413. And such adoption or ratification may be express or implied. 17 Corpus Juris Secundum, Contracts, § 69, p. 419.

The signing of the certificate by the insured, Bolin, and the payment of all premiums due, constituted an effective adoption or ratification of the act of insured's wife in signing insured's name to the acceptance slip. Her act became his act and completed the contract between the parties, there being no evidence of a contrary intent on the part of the insured.

It is next insisted that insured was guilty of misrepresentation or breach of warranty as to his health in the application for insurance and the acceptance of the benefit certificate.

Section 234, Title 28, Code of 1940 (section 8507, Code of 1923), provides: "No written or oral misrepresentation, or warranty in any contract of insurance made by a secret fraternity, or other organization of like kind, which insures its members, or others, or in the negotiation of such a contract of insurance, or in the application therefor, or proof of loss thereunder, shall defeat or avoid the contract of insurance, or prevent its attaching, unless such misrepresentation is made with actual intent to deceive, or unless the matter misrepresented increase the risk of loss."

It would serve no good purpose to set forth the evidence in detail, suffice it to say we have carefully examined all of it, and find only questions of fact presented, which were properly submitted to the jury for their determination. Padgett v. Sov. Camp, W. O. W., 218 Ala. 255, 118 So. 456; Reliance Life Ins. Co. v. Sneed, 217 Ala. 669, 117 So. 307, 310; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Gibbs, 217 Ala. 108, 114 So. 915; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Rowe, 225 Ala. 336, 143 So. 171; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Jackson, 233 Ala. 120, 170 So. 192; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Deese, 236 Ala. 85, 181 So. 274; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Moore, 232 Ala. 463, 168 So. 577; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Hoffman, 238 Ala. 648, 193 So. 104; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Davis, 242 Ala. 235, 5 So.2d 480.

We find no error in the record, and the cause is due to be and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

GARDNER, C. J., and BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. Bolin

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 12, 1942
10 So. 2d 296 (Ala. 1942)
Case details for

Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. Bolin

Case Details

Full title:WOODMEN OF THE WORLD LIFE INS. SOC. v. BOLIN et al

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Nov 12, 1942

Citations

10 So. 2d 296 (Ala. 1942)
10 So. 2d 296

Citing Cases

Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. Phillips

No written or oral misrepresentation, or warranty in any contract of insurance made by a secret fraternity,…

Sisco v. Empiregas, Inc.

Ala. Terminer Co. v. Howell, 276 Ala. 59, 158 So.2d 915; Nenow v. L. C. Cassidy Son of Fla., Inc., 141 So.2d…