Opinion
2:22-cv-01540-GMN-DJA
06-28-2023
BRITTANY WOODMAN, Plaintiff, v. NPAS SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendant.
CONSUMER ATTORNEYS BETH FINDSEN CONSUMER ATTORNEYS, MICHAEL YANCEY III, NV #16158 OF COUNSEL FOR PRICE LAW GROUP, APC CONSUMER ATTORNEYS ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF BRITTANY WOODMAN SPENCER FANE LLP MEGAN D. MEADOWS, ESQ., AYESHA R. MEHDI, ESQ. COUNSEL FOR NPAS SOLUTIONS, LLC
CONSUMER ATTORNEYS BETH FINDSEN CONSUMER ATTORNEYS, MICHAEL YANCEY III, NV #16158 OF COUNSEL FOR PRICE LAW GROUP, APC CONSUMER ATTORNEYS ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF BRITTANY WOODMAN
SPENCER FANE LLP MEGAN D. MEADOWS, ESQ., AYESHA R. MEHDI, ESQ. COUNSEL FOR NPAS SOLUTIONS, LLC
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(First Request)
1. Plaintiff Brittany Woodman (“Plaintiff'), and Defendant NPAS Solutions, LLC, (“NPAS Solutions”) have agreed to extend the time for NPAS Solutions to file a Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 23) to July 13, 2023. NPAS Solutions filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on June 1, 2023 and the current reply deadline is July 6, 2023.
2. The brief extension is requested due to counsel for NPAS Solutions having a professional conflict in the days surrounding the current reply deadline. Counsel has a bench trial set in St. Francis County, Missouri Circuit Court on July 6 and 7, 2023, which necessitates additional preparations on July 3-5.
3. This is the first request for an extension to reply to NPAS Solutions' Motion for Summary Judgment and this request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SOORDERED: