From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodliff v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 17, 1986
339 S.E.2d 777 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

71938.

DECIDED JANUARY 17, 1986.

Burglary. Dougherty Superior Court. Before Judge Kelley.

William P. Keenan, for appellant.

Hobart M. Hind, District Attorney, Nancy T. Smith, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


The appellant and a co-defendant were charged with twice burglarizing the same house, once on January 31, 1985, and again on February 5, 1985. The appellant was acquitted of the first burglary but found guilty of the second. On appeal, he contends that his character was improperly placed in issue when, in laying the foundation for the introduction of certain fingerprint identification testimony tending to connect him to the January 31st burglary, a police fingerprint expert was allowed to testify that "[w]e had the known record prints of these two individuals in our files. . ." Held:

It has been held that the admission of a defendant's fingerprint cards on file with the police, like the introduction of a defendant's "mug shot" on file with police, does not, in and of itself, operate to place his character in issue. See Hutchinson v. State, 165 Ga. App. 837 ( 303 S.E.2d 169) (1983). Accord Gravitt v. State, 239 Ga. 709, 712 ( 239 S.E.2d 149) (1977); Grant v. State, 161 Ga. App. 403 (2) ( 288 S.E.2d 118) (1982). It follows that the admission of the testimony complained of in this case may not be considered error. In any event, since the appellant was caught virtually "redhanded" on the occasion of the February 5th burglary, and since this was the only offense of which he was convicted, it follows that the admission of the testimony cannot be considered to have been harmful to him. See generally Johnson v. State, 238 Ga. 59 ( 230 S.E.2d 869) (1976).

Judgment affirmed. Birdsong, P. J., and Sognier, J., concur.


DECIDED JANUARY 17, 1986.


Summaries of

Woodliff v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 17, 1986
339 S.E.2d 777 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Woodliff v. State

Case Details

Full title:WOODLIFF v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 17, 1986

Citations

339 S.E.2d 777 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986)
339 S.E.2d 777

Citing Cases

Strawder v. State

The trial court erred in admitting the fingerprint card without redacting those portions which showed…

Keller v. State

More importantly, we fail to see how the introduction of this evidence was harmful given the overwhelming…