From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodhull v. Philpot

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Apr 14, 2008
CASE NO. 1:07CV224-SPM/AK (N.D. Fla. Apr. 14, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:07CV224-SPM/AK.

April 14, 2008


ORDER


Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment and Motion to Strike. (Doc. 16). Defendant has filed an Answer on March 10, 2008, and therefore, there has been no default pursuant to Rule 55, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff wants the answer stricken because it was five days late. Such a minor delay is not grounds for striking an answer and would only cause further delay to a just disposition of this matter. Development of this case is now in order and the parties should conduct themselves according to the Initial Scheduling Order, which was entered on March 12, 2008. (See Doc. 14). Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment and to Strike (doc. 16) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Woodhull v. Philpot

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Apr 14, 2008
CASE NO. 1:07CV224-SPM/AK (N.D. Fla. Apr. 14, 2008)
Case details for

Woodhull v. Philpot

Case Details

Full title:ANGELA WOODHULL, Plaintiff, v. IRA JUDSON PHILPOT, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Apr 14, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 1:07CV224-SPM/AK (N.D. Fla. Apr. 14, 2008)