From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodhouse v. McCarthy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1993
198 A.D.2d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 19, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Livingston County, Cicoria, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Green, Fallon, Boomer and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff may seek recoupment of payments for medical assistance by using remedies provided in article 10 of the Debtor and Creditor Law (see, Crabb v Estate of Mager, 66 A.D.2d 20; Matter of Rhodes, 148 Misc.2d 744; Bandas v Emperor, 121 Misc.2d 192). Dismissal of the action was not required because of plaintiff's failure to name the estate of Edna McCarthy as a defendant. The proper remedy for nonjoinder, as Supreme Court determined, was to direct plaintiff to petition Surrogate's Court for the appointment of a fiduciary to represent the estate so that the estate may be joined as a party (see, McLaughlin v McLaughlin, 155 A.D.2d 418).


Summaries of

Woodhouse v. McCarthy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1993
198 A.D.2d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Woodhouse v. McCarthy

Case Details

Full title:W. MICHAEL WOODHOUSE, as Commissioner of the Livingston County Department…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
604 N.Y.S.2d 460