From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodfork v. Nunn

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Jun 14, 2021
No. CIV-21-0492-HE (W.D. Okla. Jun. 14, 2021)

Opinion

CIV-21-0492-HE

06-14-2021

JAMES JERMAINE WOODFORK, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT NUNN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOE HEATON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff James Jermaine Woodfork, a state prisoner appearing pro se, filed this civil rights complaint alleging violations of his constitutional rights. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell for initial proceedings. Judge Mitchell reviewed plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the application be denied. Plaintiff has now paid the filing fee [Doc. #10].

Accordingly, plaintiffs application [Doc. #2] and the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #8] are STRICKEN as MOOT. This matter is re-referred to Judge Mitchell for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Woodfork v. Nunn

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Jun 14, 2021
No. CIV-21-0492-HE (W.D. Okla. Jun. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Woodfork v. Nunn

Case Details

Full title:JAMES JERMAINE WOODFORK, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT NUNN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 14, 2021

Citations

No. CIV-21-0492-HE (W.D. Okla. Jun. 14, 2021)