From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodfork v. Nunn

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Sep 22, 2021
No. CIV-20-0942-HE (W.D. Okla. Sep. 22, 2021)

Opinion

CIV-20-0942-HE

09-22-2021

JAMES J. WOODFORK, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT NUNN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOE HEATON, UNITES STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff James J. Woodfork filed this case alleging a violation of his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin for initial proceedings. Judge Erwin has now issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the case be dismissed and that plaintiff's motion to stay be denied.

The Report advised plaintiff of his right to object to the Report by September 13, 2021. Plaintiff has not objected to the Report thereby waiving his right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues it addressed. Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010).

Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #40]. Plaintiff's Motion to Stay is STRICKEN as moot. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Woodfork v. Nunn

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Sep 22, 2021
No. CIV-20-0942-HE (W.D. Okla. Sep. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Woodfork v. Nunn

Case Details

Full title:JAMES J. WOODFORK, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT NUNN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 22, 2021

Citations

No. CIV-20-0942-HE (W.D. Okla. Sep. 22, 2021)