From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodberry v. Leblanc

United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana
Feb 22, 2024
Civil Action 22-00979-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Feb. 22, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-00979-BAJ-RLB

02-22-2024

DERRICK WOODBERRY v. JAMES LEBLANC, ET AL.


RULING AND ORDER

BRIAN A. JACKSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Plaintiff, an inmate now confined at the David Wade Correctional Center, alleges that his civil rights were violated when prison officials retaliated against Plaintiff for exercising his constitutional rights. (Doc. 1). Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss in response. (Doc. 27). Pursuant to the screening requirements of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A, the Magistrate Judge has now issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 42), recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED IN PART, by dismissing Plaintiffs claims for monetary damages asserted against Defendants in their official capacities, and all of Plaintiffs individual capacity claims not outlined below, as such claims are legally frivolous and fail to state claims upon which relief can be granted, and DENIED IN PART, by allowing the following claims to proceed: 1) Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Donald Johnson for the attack by a fellow inmate (for which Plaintiff should be granted 21 days to amend his Complaint to allege what physical injuries he sustained by the attack), 2) Plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendants Brandy Landry, Jason Russ, Donald Johnson, and Jason Linzy, with regards to the filing of his Lost Property Claim, and 3) Plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claim, asserted against Defendants Brandy Landry, Jason Russ, Donald Johnson, and Jason Linzy, with regards to the filing of his grievance against Defendant Donald Johnson. (Doc. 42). The deadline to object to the Report has passed, without any objection from Plaintiff or Defendants.

Having carefully considered the operative Complaint and related filings, the Court APPROVES the Report and ADOPTS it as the Court's opinion in this matter.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 27) be and is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs following claims be and are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:

1. for monetary damages asserted against Defendants in their official capacities;
2. for relief against Defendants Brandy Landry, Jason Russ, Donald Johnson, and Jason Linzy outside of the Eighth Amendment and First Amendment retaliation claims outlined above; and
3. for relief against Defendants James LeBlanc, Seth Smith, Kirt Guerin, Stephanie Michel, Walter Jarrell, Craig White, Joe Buttress, Gregory Polozola, and Stephanie Gaines.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an amended Complaint specifically alleging the injuries he sustained through the attack from a fellow inmate by March 22, 2024, unless Plaintiff requests to be appointed counsel by the Court. If Plaintiff requests appointed counsel, the Court will provide a new deadline to file an amended Complaint after discussion with appointed counsel.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be and is hereby referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with this Order.


Summaries of

Woodberry v. Leblanc

United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana
Feb 22, 2024
Civil Action 22-00979-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Feb. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Woodberry v. Leblanc

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK WOODBERRY v. JAMES LEBLANC, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana

Date published: Feb 22, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 22-00979-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Feb. 22, 2024)