From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodard v. Boeing Emps' Credit Union

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 28, 2023
2:23-cv-00033-RSL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 28, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00033-RSL

02-28-2023

NOEL WOODARD, Plaintiff, v. BOEING EMPLOYEES' CREDIT UNION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY

Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant Boeing Employees' Credit Union's Motion to Stay Discovery.” Dkt. # 14. The motion is unopposed. A stay of discovery while the legal issues related to the adequacy of plaintiff's allegations is necessary to promote efficiency and avoid undue burden and expense. Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c). BECU has identified “a real question” regarding the viability of the claims asserted against it, and plaintiff has not shown that she will be prejudiced if a stay is ordered. Wood v. McEwen, 644 F.2d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 1981). Discovery is hereby STAYED as to BECU.


Summaries of

Woodard v. Boeing Emps' Credit Union

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 28, 2023
2:23-cv-00033-RSL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Woodard v. Boeing Emps' Credit Union

Case Details

Full title:NOEL WOODARD, Plaintiff, v. BOEING EMPLOYEES' CREDIT UNION, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Feb 28, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00033-RSL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 28, 2023)