In Wood, the court declined to abate the appeal because (1) property rights were involved and (2) personal representatives were prosecuting the appeal on behalf of the decedent.
Summary of this case from In re Wilson-WhiteJanuary, 1907.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
In Wood, the court declined to abate the appeal because (1) property rights were involved and (2) personal representatives were prosecuting the appeal on behalf of the decedent.
Summary of this case from In re Wilson-WhiteFull title:Henry P. Wood, Appellant, v. John A. Wood, Respondent
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Jan 1, 1907
. 92, 19 Ky. Law Rep. 2016; Whittingham v. Schofield (1902) 67 S.W. 846, 68 S.W. 116, 23 Ky. Law Rep. 2444;…
Weitl v. Moes" The principles of sections 4.2 and 4.6(1) have been applied by this court to our survival statute. See,…