Wood v. Vroman

1 Citing case

  1. NAGY v. MICHIGAN COPPER BRASS CO

    207 N.W. 850 (Mich. 1926)   Cited 2 times

    * * * That the plaintiff did proceed against the defendant under the act cannot be questioned. Brabon v. Gladwin Light Power Co., 201 Mich. 697; Wood v. Vroman, 215 Mich. 449; Smith v. Port Huron Gas Electric Co., 217 Mich. 519. His counsel invoke the doctrine that a choice between inconsistent remedies, when taken in ignorance of the fact that one has a double remedy, is not binding as an election. 20 C. J. p. 35; 9 R. C. L. p. 962.