From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 5, 1988
519 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 86-3312.

February 5, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Thomas S. Reese, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James A. Young, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Affirmed. Henriquez v. State, 513 So.2d 1285 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Because appellant's issue concerning court costs has recently been decided adversely to him, Barker v. State, 518 So.2d 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), wherein we certified a question of great public importance to our supreme court, we certify the same question in this case.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.

SCHOONOVER, J., specially concurs.


Since Henriquez supports the result reached herein and is the law of this district on an indigent defendant's right to appeal the imposition of costs where he failed to object when the trial court orally pronounced its intention to impose costs, I concur. Based upon my understanding of Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984), however, I incorporate by reference my specially concurring opinion in Barker.


Summaries of

Wood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 5, 1988
519 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Wood v. State

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY MICHAEL WOOD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 5, 1988

Citations

519 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Wood v. State

PER CURIAM. We have for review the opinion of the Second District Court of Appeal in Wood v. State, 519 So.2d…

Henriquez v. State

The Second District Court of Appeal recently certified to us the question of whether a contemporaneous…