From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wood v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 28, 1937
176 So. 755 (Fla. 1937)

Opinion

Opinion Filed October 28, 1937.

A writ of error to the Circuit Court for Columbia County, R.H. Rowe, Judge.

C.A. Avriett, for Plaintiff in Error;

Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.


The writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of grand larceny.

The plaintiff in error and one Jack Miller were indicted and prosecuted jointly for the theft of a Ford Sedan automobile of the value of Six Hundred ($600.00) Dollars.

The contention of the plaintiff in error is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.

We have examined the record and find ample substantial evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment and no reversible error being made to appear, the judgment should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

ELLIS, C.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, J.J., concur.

WHITFIELD, P.J., concurs in the opinion and judgment.

BROWN, J., dissents.

CHAPMAN, J., disqualified.


Summaries of

Wood v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 28, 1937
176 So. 755 (Fla. 1937)
Case details for

Wood v. State

Case Details

Full title:LOUISE WOOD v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 28, 1937

Citations

176 So. 755 (Fla. 1937)
176 So. 755