From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wood v. Platt

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Dec 1, 1907
57 Misc. 140 (N.Y. Misc. 1907)

Opinion

December, 1907.

Joseph Day Lee, for plaintiff and motion.

O'Brien, Boardman, Platt Dunning (John B. Stanchfield, of counsel), opposed.


The only issue raised by the pleadings in this action is whether the "plaintiff was married to defendant on or about November 9, 1901, at the Fifth Avenue Hotel, in the city and county of New York." There is no authority for the submission of this issue to a jury upon this motion, and the practice of submitting any issue other than that of adultery to a jury in an action of this character has been distinctly disapproved by the Appellate Division of this Department. Bush v. Bush, 103 A.D. 588; Packard v. Packard, 88 id. 339; Wilcox v. Wilcox, 116 id. 423.

Motion denied.


Summaries of

Wood v. Platt

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Dec 1, 1907
57 Misc. 140 (N.Y. Misc. 1907)
Case details for

Wood v. Platt

Case Details

Full title:MAE C. WOOD, Plaintiff, v . THOMAS C. PLATT, Defendant

Court:Supreme Court, New York Special Term

Date published: Dec 1, 1907

Citations

57 Misc. 140 (N.Y. Misc. 1907)
108 N.Y.S. 948

Citing Cases

Matter of Reinhardt

The authorities appear to me to be opposed to such a holding. Thus in Wood v. Platt, 57 Misc. 140, on a…

Matter of Erlanger

In matrimonial actions it has been the fixed policy of the Appellate Division of the First Department to…