From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wood v. Pa. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 17, 2013
Case No. 3:13-CV-49-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-CV-49-KRG-KAP

2013-09-17

ERIC WOOD, Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, S.C.I. SOMERSET, Defendant


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, docket no. 11, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.S 636, and Local Civil Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on July 15, 2013, docket no. 14, recommending that the motion be denied. The plaintiff was notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1), he had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

After review of the Report and Recommendation, and noting the absence of objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 17th day of September, 2013, it is

ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration, docket no. 11, is denied. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

BY THE COURT:

________

KIM R. GIBSON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice by U.S. Mail to:

Eric Wood KS-8093

S.C.I. Somerset

1600 Walters Mill Road

Somerset, PA 15510


Summaries of

Wood v. Pa. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 17, 2013
Case No. 3:13-CV-49-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Wood v. Pa. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC WOOD, Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, S.C.I…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 17, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-CV-49-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2013)