Wood v. Littell

Full title: TED WOOD, Plaintiff, v. McDOUGAL LITTELL, a division of Houghton Mifflin…

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Dec 20, 2007

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01516-DME-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 20, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01516-DME-BNB.

December 20, 2007

ORDER

BOYD BOLAND, Magistrate Judge

This matter is before me on the following:

1. Defendants' Motion for Entry of Protective Order [Doc. # 26, filed 11/27/2007] (the "Motion for Protective Order"); and

2. Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority In Support Of Their Pending Motion for Protective Order [Doc. # 35, filed 12/10/2007] (the "Motion to File").

I held a hearing on the motions this morning and made rulings on the record. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record:

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Protective Order is GRANTED IN PART, as specified on the record. The parties shall submit a revised proposed protective order, modified consistent with my rulings today, and submit it for my review on or before January 4, 2008. In the meantime, the parties shall proceed consistent with my oral rulings today.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to File is GRANTED.