From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wood v. Gold Coast Freightways, Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Dec 5, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-3819 (SDW) (D.N.J. Dec. 5, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-3819 (SDW).

December 5, 2008


ORDER


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of United States Magistrate Judge Madeline C. Arleo, filed on October 24, 2008, regarding Plaintiff James Wood's motion for remand. In the R R, Magistrate Judge Arleo considers the arguments made by the parties and recommends that the motion for remand be denied. No objection to the R R was filed.

The Court has reviewed the R R and the other documents on file in this matter. Based on the foregoing, and for good cause shown,

It is hereby ORDERED that the R R of Magistrate Judge Arleo, filed October 24, 2008, is ADOPTED as the conclusions of law of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to remand (docket entry no. 5), is DENIED.


Summaries of

Wood v. Gold Coast Freightways, Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Dec 5, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-3819 (SDW) (D.N.J. Dec. 5, 2008)
Case details for

Wood v. Gold Coast Freightways, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WOOD, Plaintiff, v. GOLD COAST FREIGHTWAYS, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Dec 5, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-3819 (SDW) (D.N.J. Dec. 5, 2008)

Citing Cases

Donnelly v. Option One Mortg. Corp.

However, as Option One correctly notes, Plaintiffs provide no proof of service showing that Option One…