Wood v. Gibson

2 Citing cases

  1. Crenshaw v. Crenshaw

    386 So. 3d 42 (Ala. App. 2023)   Cited 1 times

    The trial court also found that the child has a close bond with both parents and that it was crucial for those bonds to remain but, "in the family’s current state, it is not possible." In Wood v. Gibson, 366 So. 3d 969 (Ala. Civ. App. 2022), this court quoted T.N.S.R. v. N.P.W., 170 So. 3d 684, 687 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014), to define "parental alienation" to include, among other things, "a condition resulting from a parent’s actions that are designed to poison a child’s relationship with the other parent." Here, the father bluntly testified that he felt like the mother’s husband was replacing him in the eyes of the child.

  2. Michalak v. Peterson

    382 So. 3d 1234 (Ala. Civ. App. 2023)

    Further, even if the mother had filed such a counterclaim and failed to pay a filing fee, the failure to pay filing fees associated with a counterclaim is not a jurisdictional defect. See, e.g., Wood v. Gibson, 366 So. 3d 969 (Ala. Civ. App. 2022). Based on the foregoing, we reject the father’s arguments that the trial court erred by considering the mother’s request that his visitation be modified.