From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wood v. Contra Costa Cnty.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 2, 2021
21-cv-00611-MMC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-00611-MMC

07-02-2021

ANDREA WOOD, Plaintiff, v. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO AMEND TO ADD ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT

MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

On June 21, 2021, judgment was entered against plaintiff in the above-titled action. Later that same day, plaintiff filed a document, titled "Additional Defendant," whereby plaintiff seeks to add Claire Maier, a Superior Court Judge, as a defendant.

The motion is hereby DENIED, as judgment has been entered in the above-titled action and plaintiff has failed to show there exists any cognizable basis for setting aside the judgment. See Lindauer v. Rogers, 91 F.3d 1355, 1357 (9th Cir. 1996) (holding "once judgment has been entered in a case, a motion to amend the complaint can be entertained only if the judgment is first reopened under a motion brought under Rule 59 or 60").

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wood v. Contra Costa Cnty.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 2, 2021
21-cv-00611-MMC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Wood v. Contra Costa Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:ANDREA WOOD, Plaintiff, v. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 2, 2021

Citations

21-cv-00611-MMC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2021)