From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wood v. City of Detroit

Supreme Court of Michigan
Mar 8, 2022
COA 353653 (Mich. Mar. 8, 2022)

Opinion

SC 163674 SC 163675(64) COA 353611 COA 353653

03-08-2022

BRUCE T. WOOD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellant, and JAMES DERRICK PENNINGTON, Defendant. BRUCE T. WOOD, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. LAWRENCE LUCKETT, GEORGE ROBINSON, GREGORY C. FOREMAN, DENISE ALEXANDER-WILLIAMS, WENDELL MANSFIELD, TRACY TURNER, ROBERT GRANGER, DAN HODGES, ARTIE SQUARE, MICHAEL EASON, MICHAEL DOLLY, ARNOLD FAUST, ERIC TRUETT, LAURENCE ASKA, ROBERT RILEY, DION WILLIAMS, and ISIAH WILLIAMS, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.


Wayne CC: 15-012410-NF, 18-007356-NI

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice, Brian K. Zahra, David F. Viviano, Richard H. Bernstein, Elizabeth T. Clement, Megan K. Cavanagh, Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices.

ORDER

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 12, 2021 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE Part III of the Court of Appeals judgment, and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Rott v Rott, __Mich 2021__(decided July 30, 2021, Docket No. 161051). The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Wood v. City of Detroit

Supreme Court of Michigan
Mar 8, 2022
COA 353653 (Mich. Mar. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Wood v. City of Detroit

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE T. WOOD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF DETROIT…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Mar 8, 2022

Citations

COA 353653 (Mich. Mar. 8, 2022)