From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woo v. Martz

Supreme Court of California
Aug 27, 1946
28 Cal.2d 866 (Cal. 1946)

Opinion

Docket No. L.A. 19319.

August 27, 1946.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. John Beardsley, Judge. Reversed.

John A. Jorgenson for Appellants.

Cushman Paul for Respondents.


MEMORANDUM CASE


This is a companion case to Hails v. Martz, ante, p. 775 [ 172 P.2d 52], this day decided.

In the present action plaintiffs who are lessees of R.H. Hails (plaintiff in the companion case) sought damages for injury to their crops caused by the alleged wrongful acts of defendants Martz in closing up a ditch on their land through which surface waters had formerly been diverted from the lands leased by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment denying them relief and awarding damages against them under a cross-complaint which alleged that plaintiffs had wrongfully diverted the surface waters onto defendants' lands. The facts underlying the litigation are more particularly set forth in the companion case.

The rights of the parties here involved are dependent on the question, discussed in the companion case, whether plaintiffs' lessor is entitled to an easement by prescription to have the surface water diverted onto the lands of the defendants Martz. Inasmuch as the judgment in the companion case has been reversed for failure to find on this issue, the judgment herein must necessarily be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Shenk, J., Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Traynor, J., Schauer, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

Respondents' petition for a rehearing was denied September 19, 1946.


Summaries of

Woo v. Martz

Supreme Court of California
Aug 27, 1946
28 Cal.2d 866 (Cal. 1946)
Case details for

Woo v. Martz

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE WOO et al., Appellants, v. JAMES L. MARTZ et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Aug 27, 1946

Citations

28 Cal.2d 866 (Cal. 1946)
172 P.2d 54

Citing Cases

Woo v. Martz

The Supreme Court reversed the judgment because of the failure of the trial court to make a finding on the…