From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wong v. Petersen

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 23, 2015
2:15-cv-993-MCE-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)

Opinion


KEN WONG, Plaintiff, v. NORMAN V. PETERSEN, Defendant. No. 2:15-cv-993-MCE-EFB PS United States District Court, E.D. California. June 23, 2015

          ORDER

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

         On May 11, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

         The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

         Accordingly:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed May 11, 2015, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The above-captioned case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Sacramento.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wong v. Petersen

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 23, 2015
2:15-cv-993-MCE-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Wong v. Petersen

Case Details

Full title:KEN WONG, Plaintiff, v. NORMAN V. PETERSEN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 23, 2015

Citations

2:15-cv-993-MCE-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)