Wong v. Colvin

Full title: MARTHA WONG and DANIEL A. BERNATH, Plaintiffs, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Nov 26, 2014

3:13-CV-02209-ST (D. Or. Nov. 26, 2014)

Opinion

3:13-CV-02209-ST

11-26-2014

MARTHA WONG and DANIEL A. BERNATH, Plaintiffs, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security, Administration, et al., Defendants.

BROWN, Judge.

ORDER

Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#198) on October 22, 2014, in which she recommends this Court deny Defendant's Motion (#192) for Imposition of Sanctions. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9^th Cir. 2009). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9^th Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#198). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion (#192) for Imposition of Sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 26^th day of November, 2014.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge