From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wong v. Baker Tilly Hong Kong Ltd.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 18, 2015
CV 14-9959-CBM(MANx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2015)

Opinion


KACHUN WONG v. BAKER TILLY HONG KONG LIMITED, ET AL No. CV 14-9959-CBM(MANx) United States District Court, C.D. California June 18, 2015

          PROCEEDINGS: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

          Honorable CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 120 days after the complaint is filed. Generally, defendant must answer the complaint within 20 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States.)

         In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before JULY 20, 2015 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently:

*Proof of service on defendant Helena Laiha Kwok

*An answer by the defendant(s)

*Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

*Plaintiff's request that the clerk enter default judgment or plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment pursuant to Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

         It is plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon the default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by this Court. (Local Rules 7-1 and 7-2).

         No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if the above mentioned documents are not filed by the date indicated above.


Summaries of

Wong v. Baker Tilly Hong Kong Ltd.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 18, 2015
CV 14-9959-CBM(MANx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Wong v. Baker Tilly Hong Kong Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:KACHUN WONG v. BAKER TILLY HONG KONG LIMITED, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 18, 2015

Citations

CV 14-9959-CBM(MANx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2015)