Opinion
NO. 2019 CW 1126
08-29-2019
STANLEY J. WOMACK v. ELIZABETH WOMACK
In Re: Stanley J. Womack, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 2014-14365. BEFORE: HIGGINBOTHAM, PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ.
WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator failed to provide documentation that the writ application was timely filed under Rules 4-2 and 4-3 of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, including but not limited to a copy of the judgment, order or ruling complained of, a copy of the notice of mailing of such judgment, order or ruling and a copy of the filed notice of intent and return date, also in violation of Rules 4-5(C)(6) and (11). In addition, relator also failed to include a complete copy of each pleading on which the judgment, order or ruling was founded, including attachments to the pertinent pleading and the petition, a copy of any opposition and attachments thereto or a statement that no opposition was filed, a copy of the judge's reasons for judgment, order or ruling (if written) and a copy of pertinent court minutes, in violation of Rules 4-5(C)(7), (8), (9) and (10) of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. Relator also failed to include the affidavit required by Rule 4-5(A) of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. Relator also exceeded the page limitation for the memorandum in support of the writ application set forth in Rule 2-12.2(D), made applicable to writ applications by Rule 4-5(C)(5) of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal.
Supplementation of this writ application and/or an application for rehearing will not be considered. Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2-18.7 & 4-9.
In the event relator seeks to file a new application with this court, it must contain all pertinent documentation, including documentation to show that the original writ application was timely, and must comply with Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-12.2. Any new application must be filed on or before September 13, 2019, and must contain a copy of this ruling.
TMH
AHP
WIL
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT