From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Womack v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 25, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-2348 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 25, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-2348

04-25-2012

DAVID LEE WOMACK, Plaintiff v. JOSEPH v. SMITH, et al., Defendants


(Judge Conner)


ORDER

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of the correspondence from counsel for defendants, wherein counsel requests that the court order plaintiff David Lee Womack ("Womack") provide any letters sent by Womack to counsel pursuant to a prior discovery request and purportedly relevant to the issue of Womack's ability to exhaust his administrative remedies, and upon further consideration of the documents submitted for in camera review by Womack's counsel, pursuant to the court's directive at the pretrial conference in the above-captioned matter, and it appearing to the court that the documents are not relevant to the instant matter and are protected by the attorney-client privilege, and the court finding that the documents do not alter or call into question the court's ruling on summary judgment that it was not feasible for Womack to exhaust his administrative remedies (see Doc. 163, at 12-21), it is hereby ORDERED that defendants' request for court order directing Womack to provide any letters sent by Womack to counsel is DENIED.

___________________________

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Womack v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 25, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-2348 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Womack v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:DAVID LEE WOMACK, Plaintiff v. JOSEPH v. SMITH, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 25, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-2348 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 25, 2012)