From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Womack v. Ross

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Nov 23, 2010
No. 13-10-00362-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 23, 2010)

Opinion

No. 13-10-00362-CV

Delivered and filed November 23, 2010.

On appeal from the 377th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices RODRIGUEZ and VELA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant, Walter Womack, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 377th District Court of Victoria County, Texas, in cause number 03-2-59,226-D. The appellant has filed an agreed motion to dismiss on grounds that the parties have entered into a compromise settlement agreement resolving their differences. The appellant requests that this Court dismiss this case.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). The agreed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.


Summaries of

Womack v. Ross

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Nov 23, 2010
No. 13-10-00362-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Womack v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:WALTER WOMACK, APPELLANT, v. HOWARD ROSS, ALTON ROSS AND GWENDOLYN ROSS…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Nov 23, 2010

Citations

No. 13-10-00362-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 23, 2010)