From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Womack v. Mahoney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 15, 2018
No. 2:15-cv-2517 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-2517 TLN AC P

02-15-2018

RODNEY JEROME WOMACK, Plaintiff, v. T. MAHONEY, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed January 2, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing fee within thirty days or face dismissal of this action. ECF No. 13. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified //// //// time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: February 15, 2018

/s/_________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Womack v. Mahoney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 15, 2018
No. 2:15-cv-2517 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2018)
Case details for

Womack v. Mahoney

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY JEROME WOMACK, Plaintiff, v. T. MAHONEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 15, 2018

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-2517 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2018)