From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Womack v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2011
No: C11-0455 JSW C11-2457JSW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No: C11-0455 JSW C11-2457JSW

10-28-2011

WOMACK, et al. PLAINTIFF v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, DEFENDANTS.

DENNIS ROBERTS, APC Paul Turley, Attorney for Womack / Greer Margaret Baumgartner, Deputy City Attorney for San Francisco


DENNIS ROBERTS (SBN 36651)

PAUL RAYMOND TURLEY (SBN 177777)

Dennis Roberts, APC

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

WOMACK / GREER

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ALLOW FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINTS


JURY TRIAL DEMANDED: TRIAL DATE: SEPT. 10, 2012


STIPULATION

The City and County of San Francisco stipulates that it does not object to Plaintiff's filing of the First Amended Complaints to add the names of Doe defendants. By so stipulating, the City does not intend to waive any other right, including the right to assert that the complaint fails to state a claim against any defendant.

DENNIS ROBERTS, APC

Paul Turley, Attorney for Womack / Greer

Margaret Baumgartner, Deputy

City Attorney for San Francisco

ORDER

As stipulated by the parties, it is hereby ordered that the attached First Amended Complaints be filed with the Court.

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Womack v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2011
No: C11-0455 JSW C11-2457JSW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Womack v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

Case Details

Full title:WOMACK, et al. PLAINTIFF v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, DEFENDANTS.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

No: C11-0455 JSW C11-2457JSW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)