From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woltz v. Good

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 13, 2024
Civil Action 24-CV-6296 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 24-CV-6296

12-13-2024

BRIAN TROY WOLTZ, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN GOOD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KAI N. SCOTT, JUDGE

AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2024, upon consideration of Plaintiff Brian Troy Woltz's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1), pro se Complaint (ECF No. 2), Supplemental Affidavit (ECF No. 4), and Motion for Clarification of Service (ECF No. 7), it is ORDERED that:

1. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

2. The Complaint is DEEMED filed.

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to add as Defendants ADA Tim McCartney and “Judicial officers, court administrators, and other agents of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County.”

4. The Complaint is DISMISSED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE AND IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the reasons in the Court's Memorandum as follows:

a. The request for a writ quo warranto is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of standing.
b. All other federal law claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the exception of Woltz's § 1983 claims for money damages.
c. Woltz's § 1983 claims for money damages.and all state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

5. The Motion for Clarification of Service is DENIED as moot.

6. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Woltz v. Good

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 13, 2024
Civil Action 24-CV-6296 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Woltz v. Good

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN TROY WOLTZ, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN GOOD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 13, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 24-CV-6296 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2024)