From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolph v. Acer Am. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
Case No. CV 09 1314 JSW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. CV 09 1314 JSW

03-18-2013

LORA and CLAY WOLPH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, a California corporation, Defendant.

Daniel L. Warshaw (185365) Bobby Pouya (245527) Pearson, Simon, Warshaw & Penny, LLP Michael P. Lehmann (77152) Hausfeld, LLP Richard S. Lewis James J. Pizzirusso Melinda Coolidge Hausfeld, LLP Jori Bloom Naegele Robert D. Gary Gary, Naegele & Theado, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class Reginald D. Steer (056324) Amit Kurlekar (244230) Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP David C. Lawrence Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Attorneys for Defendant Acer America Corporation


DANIEL L. WARSHAW (SBN 185365)
(dwarshaw@pswplaw.com)
BOBBY POUYA (SBN 245527)
(bpouya@pswplaw.com)
PEARSON, SIMON, WARSHAW & PENNY, LLP
15165 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 400
Sherman Oaks, California 91403
Telephone: (818) 788-8300
Facsimile: (818) 788-8104
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class,
Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page
REGINALD D. STEER (SBN 056324)
(rsteer@akingump.com)
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
580 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 765-9500
Facsimile: (415) 765-9501
DAVID C. LAWRENCE (admitted pro hac vice)
(dlawrence@akingump.com)
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
300 West 6th Street, Suite 1900
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: (512) 499-6200
Facsimile: (512) 499-6290
Attorneys for Defendant Acer America Corporation

CLASS ACTION


JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST

TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SUBMIT

FURTHER BRIEFING REGARDING

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION

SETTLEMENT AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER


Complaint Filed: March 25, 2009

Trial Date: None

Hearing: April 12, 2013

Plaintiffs LORA AND CLAY WOLPH ("PLAINTIFFS") and Defendant ACER AMERICA CORPORATION ("Acer America") hereby submit the following Joint Request to Extend Deadline to Submit Briefing Regarding Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement (Docket No. 170) ("Joint Request to Extend Deadline") in the above-captioned proceeding:

WHEREAS on January 16, 2013, Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement ("Motion for Preliminary Approval") (Docket No. 169);

WHEREAS on February 26, 2013, the Court entered its Order Requiring Further Briefing Regarding Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement and Continuing Hearing ("Order Requiring Further Briefing) (Docket No. 170);

WHEREAS the Court's Order Requiring Further Briefing sets a March 15, 2013, deadline for Plaintiffs to submit further briefing and continued the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval until April 12, 2013;

WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendant have been working diligently to negotiate an amendment to the Settlement Agreement that will hopefully address many, if not all, of the concerns that are raised in the Court's Order Requiring Further Briefing. The parties have made progress in their negotiations and believe they will reach an agreement on an amendment to the Settlement Agreement. However, the parties do not believe they will have a final amendment to the Settlement Agreement in time for Plaintiffs to submit their further briefing on March 15, 2013. The parties therefore respectfully request that the Court grant Plaintiffs one additional week, until March 22, 2013, to submit further briefing regarding the Settlement Agreement.

WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Acer America agree that the deadline for Plaintiffs to submit further briefing regarding the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement should be extended to March 22, 2013;

THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. The deadline for Plaintiffs to submit further briefing regarding Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement shall be extended to March 22, 2013.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

____________________

Daniel L. Warshaw (185365)

Bobby Pouya (245527)

Pearson, Simon, Warshaw & Penny, LLP

Michael P. Lehmann (77152)

Hausfeld, LLP

Richard S. Lewis

James J. Pizzirusso

Melinda Coolidge

Hausfeld, LLP

Jori Bloom Naegele

Robert D. Gary

Gary, Naegele & Theado, LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class

____________________

Reginald D. Steer (056324)

Amit Kurlekar (244230)

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

David C. Lawrence

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Attorneys for Defendant Acer America Corporation

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Honorable Jeffrey S. White

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Wolph v. Acer Am. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
Case No. CV 09 1314 JSW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Wolph v. Acer Am. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LORA and CLAY WOLPH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 18, 2013

Citations

Case No. CV 09 1314 JSW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)