From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wollstein v. Mary Washington Hospital/Hospice

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 19, 2008
310 F. App'x 568 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-2014.

Submitted: December 16, 2008.

Decided: December 19, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:08-cv-00252-HEH).

Samuel Wollstein, Appellant Pro Se. Wesley Glenn Russell, Jr., McSweeney, Crump, Childress Temple, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Robin Elaine Perrin, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Jeffrey Hamilton Geiger, Sands, Anderson, Marks Miller, Richmond, Virginia; Todd David Anderson, Leclair Ryan, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Samuel Wollstein appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint. In his informal appellate brief, Wollstein failed to challenge the district court's reasons supporting the denial of relief. Accordingly, Wollstein has waived appellate review of those issues. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) ("The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Wollstein v. Mary Washington Hospital/Hospice

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 19, 2008
310 F. App'x 568 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Wollstein v. Mary Washington Hospital/Hospice

Case Details

Full title:Samuel WOLLSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARY WASHINGTON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 19, 2008

Citations

310 F. App'x 568 (4th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Wollstein v. Mary Wash. Hosp.

Samuel WOLLSTEIN, petitioner, v. MARY WASHINGTON HOSPITAL, et al.Case below, 310 Fed.Appx. 568. Petition for…