From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wollstadt v. Sigelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

May, 1930.


Order reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, to the extent of striking from the complaint the allegations contained in paragraph 12; defendant to serve his answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. We are of opinion that the allegations contained in paragraph 12, to the effect that the loan was usurious, have no place in an action brought for the specific performance of a contract. Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wollstadt v. Sigelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Wollstadt v. Sigelman

Case Details

Full title:JOHN WOLLSTADT, Respondent, v. JOSEPH SIGELMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1930

Citations

229 App. Div. 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)