Wolk v. Doe One

Full title: ALLAN WOLK Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE ONE; JOHN DOE TWO; JOHN DOE THREE; CITY…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 22, 2011

No: cv-10-0940 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No: cv-10-0940

12-22-2011

ALLAN WOLK Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE ONE; JOHN DOE TWO; JOHN DOE THREE; CITY OF PITTSBURGH; and ERIC TATUSKO Defendants.

Rolph L. Patberg, Esquire, Attorney for Plaintiff, Allan Wolk A. Bryan Campbell, Esquire Counsel for Defendant, Eric Tatusko Michael E. Kennedy, Esquire Assistant City Solicitor Counsel for Defendant, City of Pittsburgh

Gary L. Lancaster

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Filed on behalf of Defendant,

CITY OF PITTSBURGH

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

JUDGE GARY L. LANCASTER

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P.41(A)(l )(ii)

AND NOW, come the parties to this action and file the following Stipulation of Dismissal Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(l)(ii):

It is hereby STIPULATED by all parties to this litigation that all claims asserted by Plaintiff, Allan Wolk, are DISMISSED with prejudice.

___________

Rolph L. Patberg, Esquire, Attorney

for Plaintiff, Allan Wolk

___________

A. Bryan Campbell, Esquire

Counsel for Defendant, Eric Tatusko

___________

Michael E. Kennedy, Esquire

Assistant City Solicitor

Counsel for Defendant, City of

Pittsburgh

___________, C.J.

Hon. Gary L. Lancaster, Chief U.S. District Judge