From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolinski v. Eldridge

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 6, 2021
2:19-CV-2037-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-CV-2037-JAM-DMC-P

07-06-2021

KRZYSZTOF F. WOLINSKI, Plaintiff, v. LAURA ELDRIDGE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for clarification and advice on why the office of the Clerk of the Court has not sent him requested copies of his previous motions. ECF No. 22. Plaintiff apparently sought a copy of his previous motion for an extension of time to file a first amended complaint. Id.

The Court will not entertain requests for status. Nor can the Court provide advice to Plaintiff about his case. The Court will deny the motion in that respect. The Court will, however, direct the Clerk to provide Plaintiff with one copy of Plaintiff's previous motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 21).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff s motion for clarification and advice (ECF No. 22) is DENIED.
2. The Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff with a copy of his previous motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 21).


Summaries of

Wolinski v. Eldridge

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 6, 2021
2:19-CV-2037-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Wolinski v. Eldridge

Case Details

Full title:KRZYSZTOF F. WOLINSKI, Plaintiff, v. LAURA ELDRIDGE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 6, 2021

Citations

2:19-CV-2037-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2021)