From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolin v. Perlco Venetian Blind Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 18, 1943
180 Misc. 544 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)

Opinion

June 18, 1943.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, O. GRANT ESTERBROOK, Off. Ref.

Peter S. Kurtz for appellant.

J. Harry Pincus for respondents.


MEMORANDUM


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted, with ten dollars costs to plaintiff to abide the event. In view of the testimony of plaintiff that defendants' officer requested plaintiff to come and collect his wages on the day he quit, plaintiff made out a prima facie case of a hiring at will. If the hiring was at will, plaintiff can recover for the time he actually worked. However, if he agreed to work for a week and quit without justification, he cannot recover. No opinion.

MacCRATE, SMITH and McCOOEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wolin v. Perlco Venetian Blind Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 18, 1943
180 Misc. 544 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)
Case details for

Wolin v. Perlco Venetian Blind Corp.

Case Details

Full title:AL WOLIN, Appellant, v. PERLCO VENETIAN BLIND CORPORATION et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1943

Citations

180 Misc. 544 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)
43 N.Y.S.2d 262

Citing Cases

Keenan v. Artintype Inc.

He will be granted an opportunity to amend his complaint to state it. The new claim may be for salary and…

De Vita v. Rand McNally & Co.

(56 C.J.S., Master and Servant, § 104, subd. c, p. 536.) It has also been held that earned compensation…