From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfram v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Feb 28, 2012
359 S.W.3d 565 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. WD 73408.

2012-02-28

Cody N. WOLFRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Missouri, Daniel F. Kellogg, Judge.Susan L. Hogan, for Appellant. Theodore A. Bruce, for Respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Missouri, Daniel F. Kellogg, Judge.Susan L. Hogan, for Appellant. Theodore A. Bruce, for Respondent.

Before Division Three: JAMES M. SMART, Presiding Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD and JAMES E. WELSH, Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Cody Wolfram appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Wolfram claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel when counsel failed to call character witnesses on Wolfram's behalf at his sentencing hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Wolfram v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Feb 28, 2012
359 S.W.3d 565 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Wolfram v. State

Case Details

Full title:Cody N. WOLFRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Feb 28, 2012

Citations

359 S.W.3d 565 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)