From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfington v. Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 2, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-04655-JF (E.D. Pa. May. 2, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-04655-JF.

May 2, 2006


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


The motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of the individual defendants, Loebell and Manny, will be denied for two reasons: (1) the motion was filed too late, since the response is not due until the date of trial; and, more important, (2) it is obvious that there are disputed issues of material fact, and summary disposition is not justified.

An Order follows.

ORDER

______ AND NOW, this 1st day of May 2006, upon consideration of the motion for partial summary judgment filed on behalf of the defendants Loebell and Manny, IT IS ORDERED.

That the motion is DENIED.


Summaries of

Wolfington v. Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 2, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-04655-JF (E.D. Pa. May. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Wolfington v. Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania

Case Details

Full title:MARY LOUISE KELLY WOLFINGTON and RICHARD I. WOLFINGTON v. DELAWARE RIVER…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 2, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-04655-JF (E.D. Pa. May. 2, 2006)