From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolff v. State

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 13, 2016
No. ED CV 15-00244-VBF (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2016)

Opinion

No. ED CV 15-00244-VBF (AS)

01-13-2016

HERBERT WOLFF, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et. al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"), all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed (see Docket Entry No. 13), and concurs with the Magistrate Judge's order construing Plaintiff's objections as a request for additional time to file a First Amended Complaint (see Docket Entry No. 14). However, even after being granted the requested extension of time to file a First Amended Complaint curing the deficiencies of the Complaint, Plaintiff has failed to file a First Amended Complaint. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Plaintiff at his current address of record.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: January 13, 2016

/s/_________

VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wolff v. State

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 13, 2016
No. ED CV 15-00244-VBF (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2016)
Case details for

Wolff v. State

Case Details

Full title:HERBERT WOLFF, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et. al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 13, 2016

Citations

No. ED CV 15-00244-VBF (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2016)