From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfe v. Wolfe

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Dec 1, 1931
43 S.W.2d 1006 (Ky. Ct. App. 1931)

Opinion

Decided December 1, 1931.

Appeal from Graves Circuit Court.

E.L. COOPER and F.B. MARTIN for appellant.

R.A. ROBERTS and W.J. WEBB for appellee.


Dismissing the appeal.

The appellant brought this suit against the appellee to recover on a promissory note in the principal sum of $400, with interest from its date until paid. On the issues made by the pleadings and a trial had before a jury on such issues, a verdict was returned in favor of the appellee, and a judgment in his favor was entered on that verdict. An appeal to this court was granted by the court below, and this appeal is prosecuted by the appellant on that appeal granted by the lower court.

The appellee has moved this court to dismiss this appeal because the amount in controversy being less than $500, exclusive of interest and costs, the trial court was without jurisdiction to grant the appeal. The position of the appellee is sustained by the cases of Gilmore Helm v. Brown, 215 Ky. 100, 284 S.W. 1017, and Julian v. United Clothing Stores, 180 Ky. 653, 203 S.W. 549. On the authority of those cases, and under Sections 950-1 and 950-3 of the Kentucky Statutes, the motion of the appellee will have to be sustained, and this appeal is hereby dismissed.


Summaries of

Wolfe v. Wolfe

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Dec 1, 1931
43 S.W.2d 1006 (Ky. Ct. App. 1931)
Case details for

Wolfe v. Wolfe

Case Details

Full title:Wolfe v. Wolfe

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Dec 1, 1931

Citations

43 S.W.2d 1006 (Ky. Ct. App. 1931)
43 S.W.2d 1006

Citing Cases

United Carbon Co. v. Webb

Section 950-3 of the statutes provides the manner in which appeals from such money judgments may be granted…

Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Cole

Hence as will be seen the amount in controversy is the balance claimed by appellant. The appeal was granted…