From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfe v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03111-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Dec. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03111-REB-KLM

12-10-2012

ERZEBETH WOLFE, an individual, Plaintiff, v. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant.


FINAL JUDGMENT

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), and the orders entered in this case, Final Judgment is entered.

A. Pursuant to the Order Re: Motion To Dismiss [#19] entered by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on May 8, 2012, which order is incorporated by reference,

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That Defendant's Motion To Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) [#16] filed January 30, 2012, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:

a. That the motion is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's Second and Third Claims for Relief set forth in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint [#8] filed January 9, 2012, and those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction; and

b. That in all other respects, the motion is DENIED; and

2. That JUDGMENT IS ENTERED on behalf of defendant US Bank National Association against plaintiff Erzebeth Wolfe as to the Second and Third Claims for Relief set forth in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint [#8] filed January 9, 2012; provided that JUDGMENT as to these claims IS WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

B. Pursuant to the Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [#34] entered by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on December 5, 2012, which order is incorporated by reference,

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [#26] filed September 28, 2012, is GRANTED;

2. That plaintiff's claims against defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

3. That JUDGMENT IS ENTERED on behalf of defendant, US Bank National Association, against plaintiff, Erzebeth Wolfe, as to all claims for relief and causes of action; provided that JUDGMENT IS WITH PREJUDICE; and

4. That the defendant is AWARDED its costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 10th day of December, 2012.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: ________

Edward P. Butler

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Wolfe v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03111-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Dec. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Wolfe v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:ERZEBETH WOLFE, an individual, Plaintiff, v. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 10, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03111-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Dec. 10, 2012)