From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfe v. Rivello

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 17, 2024
3:24-cv-40-KAP (W.D. Pa. Apr. 17, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-40-KAP

04-17-2024

JAMES ANTHONY WOLFE, Petitioner, v. JOHN RIVELLO, Superintendent S.C.I. Huntingdon, Respondent


MEMORANDUM ORDER

KEITH A. PESTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner Wolfe's motion for a certificate of appealability, ECF no. 16, is denied as unnecessary. My recommendation and petitioner's objections to it are pending, and no further motion is needed at this time.

Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF no. 19, is denied. Because petitioner has already paid the filing fee, no action is needed at this time. If the Court accepts petitioner's objections and rejects my recommendation that the petition be dismissed then petitioner will be granted ifp status for service. If the Court accepts my recommendation, then barring order of Court to the contrary petitioner must pay the full filing fee for any appeal or seek leave from the Court of Appeals to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, because as my Report and Recommendation indicates, the history of this matter shows that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(a)(3). To the extent petitioner seeks to proceed in forma pauperis in the interlocutory appeal petitioner filed, it is procedurally defective and not in good faith.


Summaries of

Wolfe v. Rivello

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 17, 2024
3:24-cv-40-KAP (W.D. Pa. Apr. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Wolfe v. Rivello

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ANTHONY WOLFE, Petitioner, v. JOHN RIVELLO, Superintendent S.C.I…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 17, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-40-KAP (W.D. Pa. Apr. 17, 2024)