From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfe v. Courtney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 12, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01154-RPM-MEH (D. Colo. Sep. 12, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-01154-RPM-MEH

09-12-2011

MARSHALL P. WOLFE and STEPHANIE WOLFE, individually and as Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs, v. OFFICER STEPHANIE COURTNEY, OFFICER LINDSEY DOWNING, and OFFICERS JOHN DOE, Defendants.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch


ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE

THIS COURT, having reviewed the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss, with Prejudice (Docket No. 49) filed by the Parties, having reviewed the file, and being fully advised,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the claims against Defendants Officer Stephanie Courtney and Officer Lindsey Downing in their individual and official capacities, are dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to pay his or her own costs and fees.

BY THE COURT:

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Wolfe v. Courtney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 12, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01154-RPM-MEH (D. Colo. Sep. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Wolfe v. Courtney

Case Details

Full title:MARSHALL P. WOLFE and STEPHANIE WOLFE, individually and as Husband and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 12, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-01154-RPM-MEH (D. Colo. Sep. 12, 2011)