From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfe v. City of Sunbury

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Dec 5, 2024
4:24-CV-00251 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 5, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-CV-00251

12-05-2024

THOMAS WOLFE and MELISSA SNYDER, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SUNBURY and JEFFREY WOJCIECHOWSKI, Defendants.


ORDER

Matthew W. Brann, Chief United States District Judge.

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion to strike and motion to dismiss (Doc. 19) is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part:

a. The motion to strike is DENIED;
b. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED with prejudice with respect to Plaintiffs' punitive damages claims against the City of Sunbury; and
c. The motion to dismiss is otherwise GRANTED without prejudice.

2. Plaintiffs are granted leave to amend within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order. If no second amended complaint is filed by that date, the action will be subject to dismissal with prejudice.


Summaries of

Wolfe v. City of Sunbury

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Dec 5, 2024
4:24-CV-00251 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Wolfe v. City of Sunbury

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS WOLFE and MELISSA SNYDER, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SUNBURY and…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 5, 2024

Citations

4:24-CV-00251 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 5, 2024)