From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolf v. Usher

U.S.
Jan 1, 1830
28 U.S. 269 (1830)

Opinion

JANUARY TERM, 1830.

Where the point on which the judges of the circuit court divided in opinion was not certified, but the point of difference was to be ascertained from the whole record, the court refused to take jurisdiction of the case.

Mr Coxe, for plaintiff; Mr Whipple, for defendant.


This cause came before the court on a certificate of a division between the judges of the circuit court of the district of Rhode Island.


When the case was opened by the counsel for the plaintiff, it was found on inspecting the record, that the particular point on which the judges of the circuit court had differed, was not certified. The whole record had been sent up, and it contained a certificate that the judges of the court had differed in opinion, without a specific statement of what the difference was.

The court refused to take jurisdiction of the cause, and remanded the same to the circuit court of Rhode Island, with directions to proceed therein according to law.


Summaries of

Wolf v. Usher

U.S.
Jan 1, 1830
28 U.S. 269 (1830)
Case details for

Wolf v. Usher

Case Details

Full title:JAMES D. WOLF vs . GEORGE F. USHER

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1830

Citations

28 U.S. 269 (1830)